Saturday, December 7, 2019
Health Issues In Sociological Perspective â⬠MyAssignmenthelp.com
Question: Discuss about the Health Issues In Respect To Sociological Perspective. Answer: The aim of this essay is to describe the term health and to give an overview of sociological perceptions of fitness and poor health. This essay also discusses about the various patterns of inequality of health within society, and to evaluate the different perspective and views of health in our society, further it will provide a brief analysis between two different starts to the learning of health and sickness. This essay will then move on towards examining the different health types which are gender, ethnicity and class. Health has always been the dominant factor of the society. Sociological investigation into health has always been one of the repeated themes of the discipline. The state of our health is very important to us and we spend a lot of money trying to stay healthy. The sociological also speaks about the identification of the two sociological theories. This essay also critically analyzes the biomedical model and further discusses about how the medical professionals exercise their social control. Injustice and inequalities in the health sector has always been one of the most important issues and the demographic variables such as gender, socioeconomic status and race, plays a very important role in creating health imbalance among the communities (Giddens, 2016). There are many other factors that brings together to effect the health and well-being of an individual and community. There are several factors that affect our health such as, the place that they live in, the environment, disease, genetics, employment and income and so on. Education of relationship with friends and family all have a considerable impacts on health and well being whereas the more commonly used factors such as use of health care service are often given less importance (De Vaus, 2013). There are various kinds of illness that can be spotted in health and illness. The modernized western world is dominated by the pictures of healthy bodies and a dark fear of illness. Sociological insight always believes that health is a condition of a complete prosperity of mental, physical and emotional peace. It emphasizes the importance of being more than disease free, and recognizes that a healthy body depends upon a healthy environment and a peaceful mind. The sociological view, points out that our operating society plays a role in sickness and assumes that an acting society depends upon healthy people and on controlling illness (Grol et al., 2013). The biomedical model is the most effective theory in modern western medicine of health, it has been held by many official health specialists such as doctor, surgeons and consultants. The biomedical model believes that the illness is always due to some abnormalities in the body. The theory of this is something goes wrong in the body it should be fixed, as in the same way the machine is repaired. The simplest cause is taken from the illness and then it supplies to the simple cure. The biomedical model is to lessen the number of morbidity and early morality deaths. In this model, it focuses on the division of the body which work together to make sure that they have a good healthy body (Bowling, 2014). It focuses on the actual person, and not on the individual perspective of social norms. Rather than avoiding it focuses on the risk. In disparity with the biomedical model which pictures illness as motorized malfunctions, Parsons described the permanent role as a impermanent medically perm it form of abnormal behavior. Parsons used his idea from Freuds psychoanalytic theory, the thought that a sick person has a contradictory drives both to pull through from the illness and to carry on enjoying the lesser gains of awareness and to be excused from regular duties. Parson in addition used functionalism to explain the collective role of illness by examining the sick role of system. In order to be exempt from a persons every day duties and to consider to be conscious of the situation and not being completely accountable for their state, the sick person is expected to look for expert advice and to hold on to treatments in order to get well (Mechanic, McAlpine Rochefort, 2013). The affected perspective stresses over essential firmness and coordination within modern society. Sociological view which concerns on the nature of social reality does not exist. Marxist, believe doctors act as a mere agent of social control, to keep the workplace healthy and a healthy workplace is always a productive workforce. Doctors, indirectly work for the capitalists, as their job is to get people back to work as fast as possible. Two most chronicle disease that people mostly face are Diabetes and Cancer. In the past society they used to first dismiss the various ailments, just to later recognize the ailments as legitimate (Yeager, 2014). Therefore to talk about two different theorists and perspectives, there has to be the mention of Marxism and Functionalism. While both the theories have some similarities, they are different in their interpretation and they both offer a macro explanation of society, which means they both look at the overall structure of the society rather than looking at individual views (Argyle, 2013). Functionalism and Marxism both see that human behavior is directed by an external force. These two theories also view society as social structure and both of them agree that these social structures exist within a society. Both perspective falls within the positive approach, in that they focus on the object data and concerning upon structures and system rather than focusing upon the meaning of an individual. They both focus on the need of the economy and how all the institutions are relating to this. Both the theories believes in the welfare and change of the society, more the society changes the bette r their potential will be for the idealistic society. Marxism and Functionalism both emphasize on the importance of association in order to promote coherence and both claim the statue of science (Davis et al., 2015). While there are some similarities both are equally opposite in their interpretation of the social system. Functionalism is based on Consensus, which takes it starting point from the assumption that society is firmly structured and is the main element in shaping the social behavior. Anyhow Marxism is entirely different to Functionalism. From the viewpoint of Marxist, all society is the manner of production, which means the producing way dictates main relationships between employees and owners (Bowling, 2014). There is another sociological outlook which derives from the draw near of Berger and Luckmann, who argues that information is creatively created by individuals everyday and is intended for practical problems (Healy, 2014). Social constructionist does not decline to draw a difference between remedial and social knowledge; nor would it disregard disease in favor of investigative the illness experience; unlike the combine perspective. There is too much obsesses ion of having a perfect health so this means they put too much emphasis on being perfect, than normal health. On average, a society cannot cope with things like death and illness, because they are so hounded with everyone being fit that it tends to have a positive approach therefore when something bad does happen, it is hard to adapt to it. Sociology usually brings two diverse types focuses of investigation to the study of health and illness. On one point it tries to make logic of disease by applying sociological perspectives together to a scrutiny experience of illness, and also to the social arrangement of disease and health. Firstly, sociology makes an significant contribution to a flexible research into the troubles of a doctor and other health professionals, the development of health plan and epidemiological studies. Secondly, sociological enquiry also opens a door to an approval of an impact of a wider social process upon social groups of health and persons. Such processes also comprise social inequity, change and self individuality, authority and knowledge, skilled inequities and consumption and risk (Bartley, 2016). In terms of health and the diagnostic approach focuses that what it is to be ill in the culture and the meaning of it, and it would not gives any interest in health to what would be apparent as the c losed world of medical biomedicine. This perception developed from the concern with the language and the ways in which it enables us to become self-centered beings. To conclude this essay is the basic outline and the overview of the essay has to be viewed. Men are generally more interested in sports, smoking, drinking, whereas women are more inclined toward shopping, occasional drinking and their well-being (Lindsey, 2015). Structuralize perspective of health are closely tied to the social realistic definition of health. These approaches accept the reality and set out to discover what factors in society might cause illness. There is a clear evidence of health difference between social groups. While looking at which group is most likely to suffer from high rates of illness, the poorest and the most excluded groups are hugely excessive. A government study found that children from the poorest backgrounds were three times more likely to have conduct orders than those whose parents were in professional occupations. The whole world is suffering from the health illness since the beginning of time. There are many types of illness and they vary in severi ty and duration. There are also many sociological arguments over the very definition of the term and how to explain the differences in health illness within society. Therefore the emergence of public health movements in the world must be considered very important and whether they are a response of governments to changing healthcare needs. References: Argyle, M. (Ed.). (2013).Lay theories: Everyday understanding of problems in the social sciences(Vol. 17). Elsevier. Bartley, M. (2016).Health inequality: an introduction to concepts, theories and methods. John Wiley Sons. Bowling, A. (2014).Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Bowling, A. (2014).Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Davis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., Michie, S. (2015). Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review.Health psychology review,9(3), 323-344. De Vaus, D. (2013).Surveys in social research. Routledge. Giddens, A., Duneier, M., Appelbaum, R. P., Carr, D. S. (2016).Introduction to sociology. WW Norton. Grol, R., Wensing, M., Bosch, M., Hulscher, M., Eccles, M. (2013). Theories on implementation of change in healthcare.Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Health Care, Second Edition, 18-39. Healy, K. (2014).Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice. Palgrave Macmillan. Lindsey, L. L. (2015).Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Routledge. Mechanic, D., McAlpine, D. D., Rochefort, D. A. (2013).Mental health and social policy: Beyond managed care. Pearson Higher Ed. Yeager, D. S., Johnson, R., Spitzer, B. J., Trzesniewski, K. H., Powers, J., Dweck, C. S. (2014). The far-reaching effects of believing people can change: Implicit theories of personality shape stress, health, and achievement during adolescence.Journal of personality and social psychology,106(6), 867.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.